Frequency shift in spacetime

So, that paper I talked about in the last post morphed into a different paper, which I tried to publish and failed, and the failed paper morphed into another paper that I once again tried to publish.  Once again that failed also.  The papers don't get published, but apparently people are reading them to the point that negative responses seem to have been produced (1507.06663)?  I quote 1507.06663 and their conclusion.

"The relativistic versions of Planck’s Law, Wien’s Displacement Law, and the Stefan-Boltzmann Law were compared to the stationary versions, and it was determined that only in the case of spectral radiance are there non-trivial solutions by which the descriptions produce equal results."

The above statement I believe is based on four equations in the unpublished paper.  Here are those equations.

"For receiver emitting advanced photon to emitter the equation is
−h' ν'=E_r '−E_s ' .                                       (1)
For emitter receiving advanced photon the equation is
E_r=E_s+(−h ' ν ') , where −h ' ν'+hν=0.       (2)
For an emitter emitting a retarded photon the equation is
h ' ν '=E_s−E_r .                                           (3)
For a receiver receiving a retarded photon the equation is
E_s '=E_r '+h ' ν ' .                                        (4)"

The prime in the above equations is to signify that spacetime changes between the emitter and the receiver.  But the authors of 1507.06663 seemed to miss that very point.  You see any and all tests on the above Planck's Law, Wien's Displacement Law and Stefan-Boltzmann Law, both stationary and relativistic can only describe very limited changes to Planck's constant.  Let me make this very explicit.  It seems that one day I decided to see if my theory of Planck's constant changing actually was detectable by present day tests of Planck's constant.  For me, the tests are conducted about thirty miles to the northwest of where I live, in a place called Boulder, Colorado.  They give a current present day value for Planck's constant and they also give a variance to that value.  In the hundred + years we have known Planck's constant, my calculations say we still need to move the variance about three more decimal places before we will see any change in it's value.  So for all intents and purposes according to present day technology Planck's constant is a constant.  I'm not having a problem with that, but when the technology moves that variance then we will be seeing Planck's variable.  You see all the equations in 1507.06663 are for a static spacetime frozen in Planck's constant.  When I figure out the way spaectime changes due to Planck's variable then I will very probably use the equations from 1507.06663 to prove my point.  They did a very good job and I will use them when I need too.

But that isn't the point of this post.  This post is to show what I didn't show in the paper and that is how non-dimensional changes in the frequency of light are reflected in the above four equations.  We will do this by showing the additional changes as an additional prime between emitter and receiver.

For receiver emitting advanced photon to emitter the equation is
-h'ν" = E_r" - E_s".                                       (1a)
For advanced Photon traveling from receiver to emitter the equation is
-h'ν' = -h'ν" + v'.                                           (1b)
For emitter receiving advanced photon the equation is
E_r = E_s + (−h'ν') , where −h'ν'+hν=0.        (2)
For an emitter emitting a retarded photon the equation is
h ' ν ' = E_s − E_r .                                       (3)
For retarded photon traveling between emitter to receiver the equation is
h'ν" = h'ν' + ν'                                               (4a)
For a receiver receiving a retarded photon the equation is
E_s" = E_r" + h'ν" .                                       (4b)

I post this just in case you think I have limited my thinking to dimensions only and ignored other effects to lights frequency change.  Please note, equations 2 & 3 haven't changed and continue to be the basis of that unpublished paper.